Guide · Quality Measurement · Updated July 2026
eCQM Requirements Through 2030: The Move to Digital Quality Measures
eCQM requirements change every year, and CMS has been clear about where they are going: FHIR-based digital quality measures. Here is what applies today, what is changing, and how to prepare without rebuilding your quality program twice.
- 2026 · NOWQRDA-based eCQM reporting, updated annually
- 2027–2028Measure sets consolidate; FHIR reporting expands
- 2030 · TARGETFully digital, FHIR-based quality measurement
eCQM requirements today
Electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) are calculated from certified EHR data using CMS specifications and reported across several programs. As of the 2026 performance year, the core eCQM requirements look like this:
- MIPS. Clinicians and groups report quality measures, including eCQMs, with annual updates to the measure list and scoring rules.
- Medicare ACOs. Under the APP Plus measure set, Shared Savings Program ACOs report eCQMs or Medicare CQMs across their entire patient population, aggregated across every EHR in the ACO. Our ACO eCQM Reporting Guide covers this in depth.
- Hospital IQR and Promoting Interoperability. Hospitals report a growing number of eCQMs each year from the available set, with progressive expansion of mandatory measures.
- HRSA UDS. Health center clinical tables are aligning with eCQM specifications, and UDS+ adds patient-level FHIR submission. See the UDS Reporting Guide.
Submissions today are largely QRDA based, and each year’s specifications are published in advance through the eCQI Resource Center with final details set in annual rulemaking. That annual update cycle is exactly why searching for a future year’s requirements rarely gives a definitive answer: the specifications for a given performance year are not final until CMS finalizes that year’s rule.
The direction of travel, year by year
While exact future-year specifications are set annually, the trajectory has been consistent across recent rulemaking and CMS’s digital quality measurement roadmap.
-
Now · 2026
Annual eCQM updates continue
Specifications refresh each year and QRDA remains the primary submission path. APP Plus eCQM reporting phases in for ACOs, and hospital mandatory eCQM counts keep growing.
-
Near term · 2027–2028
Consolidation and FHIR pilots
Measure sets consolidate around the Universal Foundation. FHIR-based reporting options and pilots expand, and more programs add patient-level, standards-based submission alongside aggregate reporting.
-
Target · 2030
Fully digital quality measurement
CMS’s stated goal is FHIR-based dQMs computed from interoperable data, with traditional QRDA-era mechanics phased down as dQM adoption matures.
Always confirm a specific performance year against that year’s final rule and the eCQI Resource Center. The timeline above describes the direction CMS has signaled, not final regulation for future years.
What a digital quality measure actually is
CMS defines digital quality measures (dQMs) as quality measures that use standardized, digital data from one or more sources of health information, exchanged via interoperable standards. In practice that means FHIR: measure logic that reads FHIR resources directly instead of depending on program-specific extract formats.
The practical difference from today’s eCQMs is where the data comes from and how automatically it flows. An eCQM is calculated from certified EHR data and submitted in a reporting format on a reporting schedule. A dQM is designed to be computed from interoperable FHIR data whenever it is needed. That last part matters more than it first appears: measure logic that can run whenever it is needed can run during the visit, not just at submission time. Real-time uses of quality logic, like identifying gaps in care at the point of care, are the same architecture arriving early.
What actually changes: the standards behind the measures
“Moving to FHIR” is easy to say and harder to picture. Concretely, the transition swaps out the standards a quality measure is written in and the standards it is reported in. CMS and HL7 describe the shift like this:
Measure standards — how a measure is defined
Today · eCQM
- QDM data modelQuality Data Model
- CQL logicCarries over unchanged
- CQL-based HQMFHealth Quality Measure Format
Digital · FHIR
- Quality Core profilesQI-Core FHIR profiles
- CQL logicCarries over unchanged
- FHIR MeasureFHIR Measure resource
Measure reporting — how results are submitted
Today · eCQM
- QDM data modelQuality Data Model
- QRDA IPatient-level results
- QRDA IIIAggregate results
Digital · FHIR
- Quality Core profilesQI-Core FHIR profiles
- DEQM IndividualPatient-level MeasureReport
- DEQM SummaryAggregate MeasureReport
The standards transition for digital quality measurement, as described by CMS and HL7.
Read left to right, three things are happening at once. The data model changes: QDM, a quality-specific abstraction, gives way to QI-Core, a set of FHIR profiles built on the same US Core resources your certified API already exposes. The measure package changes: CQL-based HQMF is replaced by the FHIR Measure resource. And the submission format changes: QRDA I and QRDA III are replaced by DEQM MeasureReports — Individual for patient-level results, Summary for aggregate — defined in HL7’s Data Exchange for Quality Measures implementation guide.
The most reassuring box on that diagram is the one that does not change. CQL logic carries over. The clinical intent of a measure — who is in the denominator, what satisfies the numerator, which exclusions apply — is expressed in Clinical Quality Language today and stays in Clinical Quality Language under dQMs. What changes around it is the data the logic reads and the envelope the results ship in. That is why the transition is best understood as a plumbing project rather than a rewrite of your quality program, and why it is tractable: you are changing inputs and outputs, not the measures themselves.
See this architecture in practice
Our white paper shows FHIR-based quality logic running in real time inside the EHR workflow, closing gaps in care before the patient leaves.
How to prepare without rebuilding twice
The organizations that will absorb the dQM transition with the least disruption are the ones treating it as an infrastructure decision now rather than a compliance scramble later. Three moves matter most:
- Consolidate measure calculation. If MIPS, ACO, and UDS numbers come from different calculation paths, they will drift. One engine, like CQMsolution, calculating every program from one data foundation removes that entire class of problem.
- Stand up a FHIR data pipeline you actually use. A certified FHIR API that only exists for certification checkboxes will not carry you into dQMs. Ours, the Dynamic FHIR API, already carries production reporting workloads like UDS+ patient-level submission.
- Put quality logic to work before submission day. Running measure logic in real time against FHIR data is the dQM operating model. Starting with point-of-care gap identification means the transition arrives as an upgrade, not a migration.
The tools we have for the transition
Those three moves are not theoretical. Each one maps to something we already build and run in production today, so you can start the transition with the data and the measures you have right now.
Data conversion
QRDA I to FHIR
The fastest way into FHIR is to stop waiting for your EHR to hand it to you. The Dynamic FHIR API and its Datastore ingest the data you already produce — QRDA I files, C-CDA and USCDI documents, HL7v2 messages, or staged CSV — and transform it into FHIR resources.
This is not a pilot. It is the same pipeline already carrying UDS+ patient-level FHIR submission for health centers today, which means your existing QRDA-era outputs become a viable on-ramp to dQM reporting rather than a dead end.
Real-time measure evaluation
Care Insights API
Care Insights runs dQM logic — the FHIR-based form of the measures — against a patient’s FHIR data in real time and delivers the result into the clinician’s workflow through HL7 CDS Hooks, the same standard ONC now certifies to under 45 CFR §170.315(j)(20). It is available as a standalone API: CQMsolution is built on the same engine, but it is not a prerequisite.
That is the dQM operating model exactly as CMS describes it — measure logic computed from interoperable data whenever it is needed — running against the measures you report today. The immediate return is clinical rather than regulatory: open gaps in care surface while the patient is still in the room. The transition benefit is that you are running FHIR-based measure evaluation in production long before a deadline requires it.
Coverage
Digital measures we support today
FHIR-based evaluation is live for a focused initial set of measures, and that set grows with each release. The full eCQM library — every measure we calculate for MIPS, ACO, hospital, CCBHC, Joint Commission, and UDS reporting — is far larger and continues to be reported through today’s established paths.
Placeholder — replace before pushing to production
Drop the supported digital measures into the table below (CMS eCQM ID, title, and the programs each one applies to), then delete this dashed box.
| CMS eCQM ID | Measure | Programs |
|---|---|---|
| CMS___ | Measure name | MIPS / ACO / UDS |
| CMS___ | Measure name | MIPS / ACO / UDS |
| CMS___ | Measure name | MIPS / ACO / UDS |
| CMS___ | Measure name | MIPS / ACO / UDS |
eCQM and dQM requirements: frequently asked questions
What is the difference between an eCQM and a dQM?
An eCQM is an electronic clinical quality measure calculated from certified EHR data and reported through formats like QRDA on a program schedule. A digital quality measure (dQM) is CMS’s broader, next-generation concept: measure logic that computes from standardized, interoperable digital data, in practice FHIR resources, potentially from multiple sources. Every eCQM is expected to have a dQM successor as CMS completes the transition; the logic is similar, but the data plumbing and timing flexibility are fundamentally different.
What replaces QRDA, QDM, and HQMF under digital quality measures?
Each current standard has a FHIR successor. The QDM data model is replaced by QI-Core, a set of FHIR profiles. CQL-based HQMF, which packages a measure’s definition, is replaced by the FHIR Measure resource. For reporting, QRDA I (patient-level) becomes the DEQM Individual MeasureReport and QRDA III (aggregate) becomes the DEQM Summary MeasureReport, both defined in HL7’s Data Exchange for Quality Measures (DEQM) implementation guide. The one component that does not change is CQL: the measure logic itself is written in Clinical Quality Language today and remains in CQL under dQMs, which is why the transition affects how measure data is represented and submitted rather than what the measures actually calculate.
Are the eCQM requirements for 2028 or 2030 final yet?
No. CMS finalizes each performance year’s measure specifications and program requirements through annual rulemaking, typically the year before they take effect. What exists for later years is direction rather than regulation: CMS’s digital quality measurement roadmap targets fully digital, FHIR-based measurement by 2030, and recent rules have steadily expanded mandatory eCQM counts and FHIR-based options. Plan infrastructure against the direction; confirm specifics against each year’s final rule.
Will QRDA go away?
Not imminently. QRDA I and III remain the workhorse submission formats for eCQM programs today, and CMS has kept them in place while FHIR-based alternatives mature. The reasonable expectation is a transition period where QRDA and FHIR-based submission coexist, with FHIR taking over as dQMs become the standard. Organizations with a working FHIR pipeline will be able to support both without parallel builds.
What should we be doing about dQMs right now?
Three things: consolidate measure calculation onto one engine so program numbers cannot drift apart, make your FHIR data pipeline a production system rather than a certification artifact, and start using quality logic in real time where it benefits you today, such as point-of-care gap closure. All three pay for themselves under current programs and are exactly the capabilities dQM reporting will require.
Get ahead of the dQM transition
The same team that tracks these rules builds the certified engine and FHIR pipeline behind them. Tell us where your quality program stands.
