Now that the 2018 reporting year has
been wrapped up and submitted, this is a good opportunity to examine what
worked and what areas need improvement to ensure a successful 2019 reporting
year.
Rear-View Mirror
- On the Quality Net site, we
experienced issues with generating reports and site speed. Apparently, others had the same issues. Fortunately, CMS extended the 2018 deadline
from February 28 to April 14. - To compound the frustration,
Quality Net lacks an open forum for support tickets. MIPS, Cypress, CDA 2.0 and C-CDA and FHIR all
have open Jira or Google Groups for support, allowing developers, implementers, and users to comment and ask questions using a transparent process. CMS does
not. - The support process is tedious and
time-consuming. Undisclosed reporting
tool issues created “false alarms” for our calculations and turnaround on
support tickets moved slowly. Nonetheless,
we worked with the CMS help desk and technical support to ensure that our CQMsolution
calculations matched Quality Net. - In spite of these obstacles, our
new ‘Submit to DHIT’ button made testing and submitting a much smoother process. All
clients submitted successfully prior to the deadline.
Challenges
- 2015 Certified EHR Technology
(CEHRT) must be in place during the entire reporting period, although it is
permissible for the certification to happen later, as long as it is posted on
the ONC CHPL prior to the end of the reporting period. - In case you still have
doubts, 2014 Certified software is not acceptable for 2019 reporting. - 2019 Promoting
Interoperability (formerly Meaningful Use) now has a MIPS-like scoring system,
although unlike MIPS, Quality Measures are not part of the scoring. - The big challenge for EHR
vendors and other suppliers of eCQM software is the transition to Clinical
Quality Language (CQL) but, if done correctly, this transition
should be transparent to software users. - Keep in mind that your CQM results
are digested and posted to the Medicare Hospital
Compare website.
Opportunities for Success
- By submitting eCQMs to the IQR
program, you will meet PI (MU) requirements for EHR submission. - Start running CQM reports early to
identify problem areas and home in on CQMs that are best suited to your
hospital. - In spite of CMS’ new “Meaningful
Measures” initiative, the actual eCQMs and reporting period requirements are not changing
for 2019: You still choose a minimum of
4 eCQMs for one self-selected calendar quarter. - The overall list of hospital CMS
eCQM measures in 2019 will stay the same, except for one adjustment: - CMS 55 is discontinued in the IQR
program, but will remain in TJC (see below). - For 2020, CMS is proposing to
remove the 7 eCQMs (highlighted in blue, below) so you may want to take this
into consideration when choosing your 2019 eCQMs:
- For 2021, CMS is proposing to
adopt two new opioid-related eCQMs: - Safe Use of Opioids – Concurrent
Prescribing eCQM, and - Hospital Harm – Opioid-Related
Adverse Events eCQM.
TJC Submission
- The big news is that next year
Joint Commission ORYX vendors will assist hospitals using their Direct Data
Submission Platform (DDSP). Additional
communication regarding the transition is supposed to be released this Spring. - 2019 Measure selection was due on
12/31/2018. Hospitals that still need to select can do so by contacting hcooryx@jointcommission.org
. - 2019 Measures: (no changes from
2018), hospitals choose a minimum of 4 measures for 1 quarter. - We submitted to ORYX for a number
of clients and found that the calculations from our CQMsolution software were
consistent with TJC across the board.
We hope this helps with your 2019
reporting process and, as always, welcome your feedback.
reporting process and, as always, welcome your feedback.